Aaron Beam and the Health South Fraud Essay

Concerning the Aaron Beam and the HealthSouth Fraud case in our content Velasquez (2012), the accompanying inquiries from the content and my responses to these inquiries are given as mentioned. 1. Which of the â€Å"obstacles to moral conduct do you see at work in Aaron Beam’s conduct and thinking? In Scrushy’s? The snags I find in Aaron Beam’s conduct are â€Å"Rationalizing Our Actions and Displacement of Responsibility†. Excusing his activities is bolstered by remarks he made concerning the activities he had or was going to take in supporting his boss. Aaron Beam expressed in Velasquez (2012), â€Å"He portrayed the transition to himself as forceful bookkeeping however unquestionably not fraudulent† (p 68). In the ceaseless cooking of the books, each time Beam was press or coordinated by Scrushy to do as such. Aaron Beam perhaps believes that to be his escape prison free card, by pointing the finger back at his boss, as relocation of his duty. We see obviously what he was thinking in Velasquez (2012), as he â€Å"felt it was in fact inside the limits of bookkeeping rules and speculators would be sufficiently modern to comprehend what was happening† (page 68). This would identify with â€Å"Biased Theories about Others†, as he accepted this gathering of financial specialists was advanced. You really want to think he additionally felt covertly an investor(s) would scrutinize their activities and carry them to represent their activities considering the circumstance he was in with his manager. The obstructions I see in Richard Scrushy’s conduct are â€Å"Disregarding or Distorting Harm, Euphemistic Labeling, and Rationalizing Our Actions†. Concerning â€Å"Disregarding or Distorting Harm† dependent on the conviction he was doing something worth being thankful for by giving recovery treatment to patients at lower costs than ordinary medical clinics, one could induce he discovered taking the ne cessary steps to succeed he would do, all on the backs of his representatives, of which as CEO he could dishonor voluntarily. We could likewise, thusly consider â€Å"Euphemistic Labeling† as he was not above lying as deciphered by the different money related reports delivered to make the organization look increasingly productive under the cover of just business. He himself would feel pressure in 1996 as they couldn't meet second quarter projections. He would by and by ask Aaron Beam to cook the books, or the organization would confront monetary ruin. Scrushy excuses this away by saying in Velasquez, (2012), â€Å"If they could simply traverse the quarter, at that point everything would be okay† (p 69). We see plainly what he was thinking as of not long ago he felt everything was going his direction; only once again let the shakers roll. This would identify with â€Å"Biased Theories about Oneself†, as he is exceptionally sure about his capacities, so what arbitrary occasion might he be able to not control, after all he was the third most generously compensated CEO in the America; he must do it right. 2. Clarify how Aaron Beam may have utilized the â€Å"loyal agent’s argument† to guard his activities. Do you imagine that Aaron Beam’s circumstance the â€Å"loyal agent’s argument† may have been substantial? Clarify. Under the â€Å"loyal agent’s argument† Aaron Beam’s guard would be that Scrushy had requested him to control the bookkeeping records or all the more explicitly the general records. He was viewed as hesitant to consent, yet was compelled by Scrushy and somewhat scared by him to the point on occasion of dread. I don't trust Aaron Beam could have really utilized the â€Å"loyal agent’s argument†. The data shows Scrushy and Beam knew as expressed in Velasquez (2012), â€Å"From the start Scrushy and Beam both realized the organization needed to seem beneficial to fulfill speculators and loan specialists and to later prevail with regards to giving and selling organization stock to the public† (page 68). Subsequently, Beam needed to know Scrushy would ask or requesting him to get it going. In view of Beam’s reluctances, it could be contended he realized that this generally will not be right however did it at any rate. 3. As far as Kohlberg’s sees on moral turn of events, at what phase of good advancement would you place Aaron Beam? Clarify. At what stage would you place Richard Scrushy? As far as Kohlberg’s sees I trust Aaron Beam’s moral advancement would be a Level Two Stage Three. My reasonable for this is he knows good and bad both customarily and what the law says. He shows this by his underlying hesitance to help Scruchy’s choice t o control the general records. He additionally is in wonder of Scruchy, and seems to need to satisfy him as an individual in power, and demonstrates his dependability to after all Scruchy picked Beam to begin the organization with. Regarding Kohlberg’s sees I trust Richard Scruchy’s moral advancement would be a Level One Stage Two. My sane for this is it is about him; he is conceited and takes a gander at things just from his own perspective. To help this we just need to take a gander at his way of life, he has been hitched multiple times, lives luxuriously, while beneficent it shows up he tossed cash around for self-acknowledgment. The delights he gains by the entirety of this gives him motivation to accept he is directly as far as he could tell. To help this further his own representatives portray him as a tyrant, clique like figure, and an extraordinary spark. This would demonstrate he was clever in getting what he needed by any and all conceivable means, much like a ruined kid. Reference Velasquez, M. G. (2012). Business morals, ideas and cases. (seventh ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.